﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Dale's Blog</title>
    <description>This is Dale's Blog for Krause Financial Services</description>
    <link>http://www.medicaidannuity.com/Blog/tabid/76/blogid/1/Default.aspx</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <managingEditor>webrequest@medicaidannuity.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webrequest@medicaidannuity.com</webMaster>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:05:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:05:50 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>SunBlog RSS Generator Version 2.3.8.0</generator>
    <item>
      <title>IRAs, (d)(4)(A) Trusts &amp; Medicaid</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="" width="396" height="192" src="http://www.medicaidannuity.com/Portals/0/images/Blog/BLOG_01062011.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recently, I&amp;#160;worked on a case involving an individual who wanted to put his $90,000 IRA into a Self-Settled (d)(4)(A) Trust.&amp;#160; Even though I could get the IRA transferred into a tax-deferred annuity owned by the trust, there was a question as to whether the transaction involved a taxable event.&amp;#160; To eliminate the question, the safest course of action was to obtain a favorable private letter ruling.&amp;#160; However, the cost of such a ruling, whether favorable or not, is approximately $16,000.&amp;#160; This is a high cost in light of the fact that the ruling may not even be favorable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the alternative, I determined that if the entire account was subjected to income tax, both state and federal, the individual would be left with net investable proceeds of $73,650.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not wanting to accept the economic risk of an unfavorable private letter ruling, and being left with only $74,000 of investable proceeds, the individual opted to proceed with the second alternative.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, in that the individual had no immediate income needs, the Trustee invested the $73,650 into a tax-deferred annuity, which included an eight-year rate guarantee of 4.10%.&amp;#160; Assuming no withdrawals, the annuity would have a value of $101,573.07 at the end of the eight-year term.&amp;#160; Finally, with the annuity being annuitant-driven, the trust as the primary beneficiary would collect the entire account value following the insured's death.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.medicaidannuity.com/Blog/tabid/76/entryid/135/IRAs-d-4-A-Trusts-Medicaid.aspx</link>
      <author>webrequest@medicaidannuity.com</author>
      <comments>http://www.medicaidannuity.com/Blog/tabid/76/entryid/135/IRAs-d-4-A-Trusts-Medicaid.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.medicaidannuity.com/Blog/tabid/76/entryid/135/IRAs-d-4-A-Trusts-Medicaid.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 14:35:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.medicaidannuity.com/DesktopModules/SunBlog/Trackback.aspx?id=135</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>